Week 3 of 6
Team
Project partner: FibreLab
Luis Winkelbrandt
Shuairuge Shu
Molly Wensley
Mohammed Maheen
Vanashree Chowdhury
Niki Marathia
Merrin O'Connor
Jaime Santos Guerrero
Yihan Zhong
Shuairuge Shu
Molly Wensley
Mohammed Maheen
Vanashree Chowdhury
Niki Marathia
Merrin O'Connor
Jaime Santos Guerrero
Yihan Zhong
Bodystorming
Inspired by last term’s workshop on AI and Collaboration, we used Claude to generate two micro interactions involving textile waste using the formula: [object]+[unexpected behavior]+[emotion]
The Human cocoon
A towel’s secondary function is a heavy, damp cloak. By draping a wet towel over your shoulders, you effectively lower your body temperature through a process of sustained shivering—a clever way to ensure you never feel too comfortable after a hot shower.
The Sound Hush
Large, abstract wall panels constructed from layered textile remnants that serve as acoustic dampeners, inspiring awe through their texture and ability to quiet a room.
We felt that the results were a little too bizarre for us to develop, so we tried a new exercise. Acting on last week’s tabletop feedback, we set out to give a towel new identities by prompting each other to interact with it as if it were something different.
To begin, we used prompts like ‘this towel is a ponytail’ or ‘this towel is a hat’
We then focused on hospitality scenarios like ‘this towel is a lobby carpet’
Finally, we used hotel-specific prompts like ‘this towel is a room service tray’
Some interactions stood out
The exercise helped us embody the entwined relationships between humans and objects we encountered in Bennett's (2010) Vibrant Matter. When pretending the towel belonged to someone we loved (fig. 7), we folded it carefully and presented it as an object waiting for someone to return.
When we pretended it was a dinner table (fig. 4), it needed to be held close to the face and required a second person to stretch the fabric taut on the other side. Though the towel is soft, we were able to present it as an interface to eat from.
We didn’t want to risk wasting a towel by staining it for this exercise, so we made a representation out of paper. Asking our classmates what they think happened to it and whether they would use it, we wanted to explore what, if anything, would motivate them to engage with it. No one thought the towel was useable until we asked Eric whether he would use it if it was made by Balenciaga, to which he replied that he would. This response made us want to explore what else might change someone's perception of a stained towel beyond luxury brands.
“Dye it so you don’t see what it’s been through. In Hindu philosophy, objects retain their past”
—Vibhooti
“Disgusting”
“It should be clean and spotless”
“It should be clean and spotless”
—Matthew
“I would use it if it was Balenciaga”
—Eric
Feedback
During our table top presentation, we were encouraged to extend last week’s clothes swap activity to our towel explorations. We decided to try living with someone else’s towel in our space to record where we store and how we use it. To best align this activity with the cultural probe method, we created a diary for us to write our thoughts and map our interactions (fig. 15).
Our activity video
Tools
- Phone camera
- Black pen for floorplan, colour for the legend
Rules
- Document your interactions with the towel in your space
- Before you alter the original makeup of the towel you must ask the owner
- respect the towel
- Document all interaction between you and the towel and other object and the towel
- Be positive and kind - good vibes only
Try to engage with these themes:
- The social construction of object meaning and value
- Human–object entanglement and the agency of non-humans
- Object biographies and the temporal life of things
Click to expand
Places our towels went
How they were used
Figure 22. How people used the towels
Figure 23. Why people didn’t use the towels on their body
1 circle = 1 use
Sources
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger. Routledge.